2024! Happy New Year!
I have not been a good blogger, but I'm hoping to recommit to this platform by participating (once again) in Amy Johnson Crow's "52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks" blogging initiative! Thankfully, Amy gives participants grace - there is no pressure to post every single week. As a matter of fact, we are free to change it to 12 Ancestors in 12 Months - or whatever suits our lives and schedules. I love (and share) Amy's perspective that anything we do is more than we had before!
The prompt for the first week is "Family Lore," also known as "oral history" or "oral tradition.
No matter what you call it, this is something that I don't have a lot of in my family - especially not in my immediate lines. What I've discovered, through the past 30 years of interviewing relatives, is that even where my family members did have stories, most of of them only contained that tiny "grain of truth" that we all know is usually there. My research has uncovered realities that don't match what has been passed down; and that hasn't made me very popular with some of my family members, most of whom were new to me - discovered as a result of my research and/or dna testing.
Here are just a few of the stories that have been fine-tuned by my work:
1. Oral history: My second-great-grandmother, Anna Green, was at least 1/2 Native American. Her mother was "full-blooded Indian."
Truth: As uncovered by MtDNA testing done by a cousin who is a confirmed direct female descendant of Anna Green: The MtDNA is from Africa.
2. Oral History: There are three distinct, unrelated groups of black HILL families in Tyrrell County, NC.
Truth: All of the black Hills in Tyrrell County, NC trace back to one couple, my third-great-grandparents, Charn/Charlton/Charnton/Charleston Hill and Grace/Gracy Bryant, free people of color, born in 1794 and 1800, respectively. The couple had at least 9 known children, from whom all of the resulting Hills in Tyrrell County descend.
3. Several of my GREEN ancestors moved to New York and were living/passing as white and all had white spouses. Another was said to have been doing the same in Florida.
Truth: Although these ancestors certainly looked white, most of the records I've found them in record them as black, mulatto, or Negro. Only one, my second-great-grand-uncle, William A. Green, had consistently ambiguous racial categories, and more often than not, was noted to be white. William was also the only one who actually married white.
This is either Bettie or Ruby Green. |
William Adam Green, who served in a black regiment during the Spanish American War, but tried to obscure his race in New York. |
4. Oral History: My mother's father abandoned their family before my mother turned four, and they never heard from him again.
Truth: Well, this one is kind of juicy, but I won't go into all the details on this post. My grandfather, Daniel W. Hill, did abandon my mom and their family before my mother turned four, but it turns out he rented a room in the boarding house next to theirs, at least for a while, because my mom's older brother recalled him sitting in an upstairs window "glaring" at them, all the time, and I have a 1937 document (SSA) giving that house as his address. However, he didn't stay there long. My mother lived her entire life believing that her father had just disappeared, never to be heard from, again. But the truth of the matter is that he got involved with another (also married) woman, impregnated her, and then died in June of 1940, one month before my mother's half-sister (who my mother never knew or knew about) was born. My mom was 6 years old at that time.
SS Application of my grandfather, Daniel Hill, showing him living next door to his family in 1937. |
5. Oral history: This one is a little different, because the "family lore" actually evolves around the name my father's family has carried, since my great-grandfather, Calvin Yarborough, was emancipated in 1865. Whenever I questioned my late aunt, Susie Yarborough Hawkins, about our family history, she always told me that all she knew was that we "had some connection to the Neals" or that "we were supposed to be Neals." But that was all she would say. She couldn't explain the how or the why of it.
Well, those are just a few examples of "family lore" that has been been shared with me and debunked, since I started doing this work. Remember that these stories will usually have some bit of truth in them, somewhere, but it's up to us - the researchers - to uncover the truth of each matter, as best we can, using all of the tools we have at our disposal to dig into the past. :)
Thanks for reading!
Renate
Permalink to this post: https://justthinking130.blogspot.com/2024/01/happy-new-year-i-have-not-been-good.html
Great post, Renate. I plan to also recommit to blogging this year.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Dru. I look forward to reading your posts!
DeleteI have had the same experience with oral history. Even when it's way off though, there have been hints to show me the way to the real story.
ReplyDeleteThose tiny little "grains of truth" are so important to our research. Thanks for reading, Kristin!
DeleteI am trying again! Hopefully I've got it right this time. I have found oral history to be invaluable, but often off in some details. Without it, though, I would never have been able to get where I am with my family history searching.
ReplyDeleteYour comment came through the first time. Forgive me for being tardy in responding.
DeleteThank you very much for this info Renate! Now I have a full understanding of the Neal and Yarborough name relationship. I appreciate all the research and extra work you do for our family.
ReplyDeleteGod bless you cousin.
Thanks for reading and commenting, Cousin Lisa!
Delete